Reflections on 60 years

 Reflections on 60 years: the ruling party must establish basic political ethics
2009-08-15 13:29
Miles
the sixtieth anniversary of the founding, and I heard the parade was busy preparing, I am an old , and legs not working, may not be attending the Tiananmen Gate. In the past, I am not in charge of media coverage this one, but I know that for six decades, Daqing, there will be many large-scale publicity, mainly in order to promote the achievements and progress of the State This is the way to six years old, and has not changed. The other day, a young professor at the Central Party School to me to chat, he was very young, very thought.
he always said he was generation of reforms, and an old man like me is the revolutionary generation, young people are thinking is very active, give me a lot of problems, some views seem to offend some of our party claims and practices. However, much about them the more I believe they sincerely, not to the meaning of chaos. Sometimes, I feel offended by their questions, which may indicate that I am not as good as these young people in good faith, I just always tell them, young people To know more history.
the other day, he came again and said to me to ask the history of the problem is not that he mentioned, but that he taught the students to put class level cadres, he said He could not answer, put the question put to me. cadres in the discussion that students ask is: are the founding six years, and what our country has not changed things? Why not change? will not change? his mean I know, six years of daily media coverage of Daqing, said what happened to the people what kind of changes that can not be another angle to think about, a country to a political party leader six years, and time is not too short It should be six years in the end how to summarize, how to sum up, our party has a duty to tell the people clearly understood. a moment he could not talk does not understand, there is doubt, it does not matter, it is important to talk out of public speaking out, do not hide do not speak or talk in private. Jianguo all six years, and still can not openly discuss some issues deserve any of these six years? We are over the people, has the responsibility to speak clearly understood, especially the basic facts, some basic principles, you can not order was sleepy and can not make people sleepy.
I told the young professor, founding six years, and we have not changed in this country there are many, many things. basic facts is that this country is led by the Communist Party of China, a fact everyone knows that, but the fact that behind what is it? For example, our party has more than 7,000 million members, is one of the largest party, the party still not society Management registered, the fact that behind what is it? is our country not a or the party's national wall has not been established. take a look, millions of troops also called the People's Liberation Army, has not changed, not the true sense of the country's armed forces. the supreme leader of the army or the party's highest leaders. the party is not the military one of the country the leadership of the army instead. six years, and this point has not changed.
even in the party, six years, and do not establish a real sense of the competitive electoral system, not to mention in a national context the. often said consultations, in fact, the operation or the secret war tradition. These are some basic facts, what they can come out of basic principles, it should be a good discussion. These discussions can not do without these basic facts, young people really ought to know a lot of history. I remember the early days, several democratic parties to the central letter, the proposed return to Zhongnanhai, the people, the Royal Garden is best as a public culture of the early monuments survive .80, secretary and received a similar proposal, but also added a: CPC Central Committee organs should be listed office, the General Office of the Central Organization Department, Propaganda Department, United Front Work Department, are the ruling party's organ, is not illegal underground organ, the proposed transfer several secretary's hands, not on the final will be discussed. these two things is not changed six years.
later, the professor told me that he thinks particularly of some of the issues, but still did not think So how about some basic facts to understand. I know that through many channels, more than a decade of new ideas, new formulation, no matter what kind of theory of what kind of school, six years on the state of things changed, things did not change first engage in and understand basic facts. Some things should not be changed, can you change, can not be changed, to separate, more difficult. to discuss the problem, then figure out the basic facts from the start. I was young, said Professor So you ask a question, I have no choice but said the fact that the basic facts. thoroughly understand the basic facts, and thoughtful people will think, this kind of a kind of political inertia? or a political stagnation? should do research, to be specific analysis, the conclusions do not empty the next.
few years ago, an old comrade was seriously ill, I went to see him, he spent more than an hours of his country to me, all the concerns about the status of the party that wanted to talk directly to the central leaders. He said he had no chance, I said, I promise to turn to. Later, a Standing Committee of the gay point of view me, I passed on, I especially can not forget is that a specific reference to the old comrades of the revolutionary all his life, in the end how the people, to history be accounted, there are so many no doubt find out, explain how it good? founding six years, and I think this is a good opportunity, it should be a good summary, a good discussion. I was an old man, and for the country a lifetime of work for the Party, how can give up the kind of feelings can not be I always do not agree with years, can not say it is brilliant, publicity and the word, but also pay attention to precision, to meet the basic facts. you do not deduct those years, people will be deducted in the heart of the historian will be deducted. Ordinary Party members will not do that. that in the 90 years I have said more than once, too far from the truth of political propaganda, it called? that is uncivilized, barbaric propaganda.
governance in those years rough handling on the terminal station, which should govern a barbarous government propaganda. I would not hear. these six years, and why it has not changed, not only young people to think about those of us who have to think over, called reflection. six years, and should make to celebrate, it should seriously consider. to reflect on the whole country, to give the party reflection. a ruling party, a big country the only ruling party, the ruling party for six years, the total Reflection should have at least the courage to it. This is in fact a responsibility, the responsibility of political parties. This reflection will certainly leads to many different views, which is nothing strange for? If do a tense, engaging in a number of block action, it seems we are too tolerant of the no. In my opinion, people's views, the views of democratic parties, experts and scholars view the political views of frustrated people, these four people's views, in particular, should take Listen, not ban, six years, and I'm still here, a thousand years ago the ancients said that some of those reasons, people feel uncomfortable to think of it.
presided over the early eighties have a Secretariat work old comrades in his later years lived several years in Shenzhen, one time I went to see him, and talked about his tortuous life experiences, he said, to this country, for the party, he has a great appreciation, the two major regrets. comforting that he personally promoted the reform and opening southern China to become the forerunner of national development. A Unfortunately, there is no history for a major party's grievances redress, and the other is regrettable that the party does not promote tolerance policy on dissent. He did not talk much, then, the two of us only relative silence. Jianguo all six years, and the early days of New China, some of the policies that some political reasons, it was not true For six decades, ah. those reasons now exist? still valid you?
if those reasons still valid, then, six years of political power, ideological, cultural, but also with the summed it? tolerate different views of the mechanism has not been established, it can only show that the set of Stalinism is still treadmill: the more successful revolution and construction, the enemy's resistance to the more serious. Otherwise, what six years in this regard There has been no change? old comrades who had died a few years ago, his long-cherished wish, and still is a cherished dream. This is how the people accountable to history? split from the KMT-CPC cooperation first started to drive away the KMT in 1949 we KMT repression of our 22 years, to block our newspapers, killing our party members, in school to suppress different opinions. History has proved that they have failed. We absolutely can not use similar means to deal with them, treat other people. VI Twenty-two years of the decade, which is a concept of what kind of time?
I was a senior leading cadres of the party, now enjoying high political treatment. I asked the young professor, I run out by the These words, is not to let him feel weird? He honestly told me that he really did not know whether it was unbelievable. I want to say is that, because high-ranking cadres, even should the height of the historical responsibility to consider the issue Otherwise, equivalent to senior officials of the senior cadres, it should never be tolerated. historical responsibility is an issue of political ethics, of a political party is responsible, we should ponder this question.
I say this because I for many question for a long time. I remember the late seventies, when trees have a party comrades referred to the political ethics of speech, the word, this is the first time I heard the word. there is a meeting break, I ask him specifically He said he has experienced many ups and downs within the party, political ethics is really hard to describe. but he was never talked about it. Yes ah, to founding three decades, the party only a great scholar so mention such a sentence.
after not mention. another three years, and still no one talks about. I do concrete work, not so high theoretical level, can turn the head of a doubt that the three ten years: We were so unbearable to talk about political ethics? I want to say is, people 22 years to block us, we have the necessary time to spend six years of eye for an eye up the body of its people? this reason not to is the political ethics? We do not publicly talk about, can prevent people to think about this problem? so many problems later in the conversation that Shenzhen has been hit in my head to hit to, in time also expel . To be honest, I do not want to understand that this may not be able to use The leader of the National Day in Tiananmen Square that day, to salute the People's Heroes Monument flowers. future generations to the past for doctrine, for the devotees pay homage to the ideal, is it not a basic political ethics it? Without their sacrifice, there is no power, this is a basic fact. But the people who stand up to explain why for the past fifty years have not done so? No, not even a simple explanation at all. It seems all of a sudden get back to politics and ethics difficult. tens of millions of members under you, you rule over a billion people, fifty years, and even a solemn ceremony to pay tribute not, is not there should be a solemn apology for it. Who did not do should be done, who wrong thing, who will stand up and bear the responsibility. This is the least ethical.
Our party has always used to boast that many people are doing everything right, while, but then why not the past the right thing to do even a basic explanation at all. It is often said Prodigal Son Sweet Basil, Sweet Basil to have this prerequisite is to have a reflection, must take responsibility. We are such a great country, imposing such a large party, would always ambiguity in the past, has become what! employing the wrong, the person responsible was recommended to study evaluation system is also irresponsible, irresponsible and consultation mechanisms, and discipline inspection commissions have just investigated, regardless of the employer in the process of oversight responsibility of the people locked up or shot, even if the end, and also investigate and deal with this person that is a great achievement. In this way, this country does not become a responsible country that no one yet? our party not to become no negative responsibility of the party yet? this trend continues, we talk about that political ethics and what?
think about it, our party are all of those major mistakes before hitting the southern wall back, and this wall is a natural law, objective law of development of the country, you are violating the law to a badly beaten. Why is that? six decades, our country did not grow from the social forces should have to compete with us, to remind, to monitor our party , because all those different opinions do not reflect our party's right to hear their. so full policy, it would assume responsibility for it solely, but also not. how much time in six years, been hampered national development, national development opportunities lost , and constitutional rights are not realized. This phenomenon is very ethical. who I sent a message of the old comrades said to me: you and I have grown old, for fear that the final nail difficult conclusion it! I has come to an old age old age, and so the total could not escape blame.
Once you have ethical responsibility, certainly not easy to live. a country, a political party is probably the case. I always want such an old man and young together, is to ears, to hear how these people said I was. The young professor said to me, six years, and our country has not yet appeared complete sense of the voters, our party has no right to complete members, we have not set up to allow other people to play a political role in the system, the largest of these is not your personal anxiety? my professor Wangnianzhijiao, because he transferred my child through an essay he wrote, he said he did not to publish, just wanted to spread within the party, stimulate discussion, the article said talk with him many times. or from the start with the basic facts. from the time of founding, our party say they represent the peasants and workers, since 2049, said representatives of the hundreds of millions of Chinese people, to the founding of sixty years now or so terms. We also see that, six years, and did not seriously stringent procedures to give the kind of political representation, elections, non-election, are not.
home to some of the provincial mayors often see me, I always told them, your job is the need to get elected, and to the ability to elect their own, do not always hopes behind the NPC delegation in the role of party organizations. by The role of the chosen face to red, the discipline of party members vote to unify the implementation of binding decisions of the party, which is , it becomes the advantage of suppressing dissent, where there is a large caucus like this? This is not the mechanism of equal competition, six years is true, has not changed, the procedure is difficult to say this is a serious, rigorous. in accordance with the present electoral law, which the Department is not illegal, but it is contrary to the political ethics, equal to one party control of the electoral machinery, the expression of public opinion to be true, that is a difficult task. It was no one visible.
School The professor told me six years to deal with various crises, such as political instability, internal strife, public pressure, abnormal movements of personnel, there have been many very stereotypical way of crisis management, has accumulated a lot of talent have such a big advantage, why did not intend to engage in equal inter-party competition? I said, I can not answer this question, but the overall feel of a competitive election is not over the ridge around. Now also stated that the Chinese engaged in real sense of democratic elections, conditions are not ripe, it seems that Chinese farmers more, the quality is not high, China has no tradition of democracy, this is a disadvantage. However, when these disadvantages into advantages, the organization may be no advantage by that time, another reason not to open and democratic election. This is the political deadlock on the ethics, when it will completely solve? Sixty years have passed, but also to wait for decades?
founding sixty years, should go back to a basic question. people in this country will in the end is what? what approach should be adopted to express the real opinion? this problem, the Soviet Union did not thoroughly understand, aged nine to national perdition party I never been a populist, with my decades of political experience, I dare say, the expression of public opinion is a national political system, standards. I always receive many letters from people, I asked the Secretary to pick something that makes me see, for many years to do so. Last year, received a letter from a farmer in Shandong, he asked me: You Beijing leadership in the end that do not know what we think, what you want? I think of the sixties difficult times, call our investigation and study, Daxing, I went down to the countryside, go for two months, it reported to the CPC Central Committee and a summary piles of questions, among them the problem. Four years later, let the people asked this question out. people from our radio and television, newspapers can not find the answer, asked to come over our heads. < br> Of course, public opinion itself is very complicated, there are all sorts of people, there are a variety of different views, this is normal. The key is that our party is not the face of public opinion, but also in what kind of system to ensure public access to the full, authentic expression. Now the TV people want to be rich to report the development, want to live any better. This is an improvement, because in the past not to say so publicly. This not to say the responsibility who is? Now people always want to get rich it? They want to participate in more social and political affairs, want to have more rights, more opportunities for development. Why do not they speak publicly? the responsibility of this not to say , then who is? six years, and we should not say that the mistakes in the handling of public opinion is our biggest mistake, which is to be written into the history books of .90 that the early years, a number of signature letter, manifesto, open letter, I said many times, do not fuss, do not make seal killing, people have something to say, let him say it, what can not bear. I say that no one is listening. a pipe ideological propaganda I went there, said the leadership, I dare not matter Yeah, the central selves that I cover this, whether that is in default. You see, this is the concept of his responsibility is not responsible for the public.
Let me particularly sad that, many people also guide public opinion vulgar, utilitarian. distort public opinion, public opinion held hostage This has resulted in very serious consequences, but also a violation of political ethics. When the late nineties, a number of old comrades participated in the Korean War to the central letter, to ban a number of scholars have published the latest research on the results of the Korean War, they believe that these Fixed some past research findings, so that they emotionally can not stand. This is the opinion now, but this is what public opinion? these old comrades in the end to know how much of that war? those experts to the former Soviet Union, but there is checked just open the file, do academic research. Is there anything wrong? have an academic bent Jiaoyuan written to me calling, I turned to the leaders of his letter, finally came to nothing out. those old comrades in the head conclusion in the end come from? is not instilled in them from the outside. to use the facts to correct some of their old ideas, say no, say the old comrades to take care of the feelings of, say, ;, what is this political logic?
six years, and should be changed and can change many things in such a logic, to become such a change, not change things, to establish basic political ethics There are many obstacles to overcome. the first, six for ten years, the country's disorder in our party to be tied to a past so many years of struggle, not without cause tossing in our own party. It makes me sad We bring disaster to the state party's toss, brought calamity to the people. so many years, we tell people that the country does not, it would chaos, and people really afraid of the extreme fear of torment, and they look forward to stability, to become ruling party and then we go on a separate . Six years ago, we put up a passage of is a basic fact. There is also a fact that is why they sacrifice? they fought for was the fact that we set the goals and ideals of China, and now, how many people know what was set up specific goals? I know, 90 years When, out of a book, entitled I have all read, and I also found a number of experts specializing in the history of the situation and asked, they told me, this book collection, all of our party in the thirties and forties published editorials, comments, statements , no one was forged. At that time, our party made the commitment to the Chinese people, to establish a democratic, free and independent country. At that time, the KMT not to engage in democracy, do not give free, no ability to make a truly independent state , have promised to replace those shoulders. These commitments it attracts numerous people with lofty ideals. Those who belong to the expense of these people.
In fact, those who committed three to four decades many works have. However, to the fifties and sixties were the writings of the editorial board change out. I have seen a document sent to the original and revised laboratory was a big shock to my heart. Now, I can openly say twenty years before I head to produce the questions, so a modified method that thousands of people have died in vain it? it is in black and white, indeed overturned the current commitment of our party. that light, this is not respect history, in essence, This is a violation of political ethics, which is tantamount to the power basis of our party was built on the beach, which can secure it? history back to the people the truth always, and not six years, seven years, not seven years eight years, people always want to know when the .91-year, some experts to the central analysis of the reasons the Soviet Union to write the report, saying that Gorbachev destroyed the Soviet openness, destroying the Soviet Union. I drew this conclusion is greatly under the question mark. as I see, not the openness wrong, but out late. In many matters, we always have some experience as a lesson learned when the experience This does not change is absolutely impossible.
founding six years, and how many things are not clear to people 80 years of drafting the ; sent later, this principle still works today, are used by some as a cover up the truth, a shield to evade historical responsibility, let the party of reform more difficult. Last year, the commemoration of three decades of reform and opening up, some turning point in the history of the parties to do a little disclosure of the truth, but still set a lot of rules, so that inspection, there is some party I chatted about 1976 to Oct. 6 years some of the things I've confirmed some of hearsay, this event behind the scenes, our people in the last year of a Southern newspaper to see. In handling of the twelve years. conceal who bears responsibility for this?
the use of a relative of the ruling party's leaders, intelligence agencies, military forces to resolve disputes within the party, this it? Premier Zhou was founded on admonished Li Kenong comrades, intelligence agencies not involved in the struggle within the party, he warned against those of our party of irregularities it? six years, and the ruling party even if not convenient to the people clear, at least tens of millions of party comrades should first make it clear, in the commends those countries into a new situation to make a special contribution to the people, it should also explicitly deny them the means used, this meet the basic political Ethics. Now, have not heard of such a denial. a party in power for six years does not pay attention to this point, what's the use to ability? no political ability to govern based on ethics, what will become the ability to I think you will seriously consider this issue.
our party six years, and began to say the decision-making more scientific and began to say the balance of power, but how to do in the end? political ethics does not seem to say not , said not enough light, but also have the means, there is a system to implement this ethic. in the absence of the founding of the time to put forward , His Holiness did not answer this problem. This serving the people sources, said that as long as the promise of a political party services for the people, there is the legitimacy of the ruling, I think that this view is premature, on the basic facts are not clear.
six years, and as long as the concerned countries future development of the people, think of how to advance the issue of political democracy, our people, social groups, both on the national political life can not express independent views, it can not actually participate in the political process, and supervision of the ruling party can not, people that they deserved this ; three no's .
I am so old, and said so much. Some young people will call me, when in office did not say how, how does this blame is justified, I can not use the objective circumstances, objective factors to shift the part I should take the historical responsibility. that so many political ethics, I would take to develop the kind of political ethics in the drafting of .80 The political quality of the elderly. But he believes that this evaluation should help us to do it. This way, difficult to leave. If neither future generations the kind of qualifications Comrade Xiaoping, and do not speak basic political ethics, which After things have to rely on to future generations of. Someone has to speak up, I considered one of the bar.